patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Officials Announce New Jersey Transit Safety Measures

Safety initiative comes after death of three teenagers in October

 

A variety of safety measures will sweep New Jersey Transit lines within the next year or so, transportation officials announced Wednesday, in an effort to reduce the number of accidental train deaths across the state.

The safety improvements, which include improved signage, warning systems and educational programs, are the result of a three-month study by the Safety Along Railroads Leadership Oversight Committee, formed in wake of the deaths of three teenagers by New Jersey Transit trains last October.

"We are really energized about this with a sense of purpose to move forward from the sorrow and grief of each railroad fatality," said James Simpson, commissioner of New Jersey Department of Transportation, at a press conference Wednesday at NJ Transit headquarters in Newark.

On Oct. 2, 2011, Nicholas Sabina, 17, of Fairfield, and Alan Mendez, 16, of Wayne, were taking a popular shortcut over a train trestle in Wayne when a train bore down on them and another friend. Fifteen-year-old Darian Robinson, of Little Falls, jumped to escape the oncoming train, but Sabina and Mendez were killed.

The following day, Michael Cabaj, 13, was struck and killed by a train after ducking under railroad crossing gates near the Plauderville station in his hometown of Garfield.

The deaths, three of 23 fatalities involving NJ Transit trains in 2011, underlined the need for better safety on and around the tracks, Simpson said.

Twelve "high-priority action items" with a focus on engineering, education and enforcement are expected to be implemented by NJ Transit and NJDOT within the year. The organizations will pilot gate skirts at some stations with grade crossings, a path used by pedestrians and sometimes cars to cross train tracks, to prevent people from ducking under gates. At the Plauderville station, "second train warning" signs will be tested to alert commuters of trains entering or exiting the station.

"Crossing gates is a pervasive problem in New Jersey," said Simpson. "It's dangerous, it's against the law and it models bad behavior for children."

Improving public education on rail safety is also a priority, Simpson said. NJ Transit is expanding its Rail School Safety Program, presentations held at schools near rail lines, to include compelling accounts from transportation officials involved in pedestrian train accidents. NJ Transit will also launch an aggressive public awareness campaign using social media, videos and advertisements.

Officials are also eyeing four high-risk crossings that will be studied for possible safety improvement plans: Morris Street in Dover (Morris/Essex line), Chelsea Avenue and Fifth Avenue in Long Branch (North Jersey Coast line), Outwater Lane in Garfield (Bergen County line) and at the Mount Tabor station (Morris/Essex line). The crossings were determined following a hazard analysis which examined the number of trespassers in the area.

Simpson did not specify which train stations would be getting safety measures. 

While the number of accidental train deaths can be reduced through improved safety measures, not much can be done to prevent suicides, said NJ Transit Police Chief Christopher Trucillo. Suicide hotline advertisements and telephones were installed about a year ago at the Hamilton train station, which saw numerous suicides-by-train in 2010.

In 2011, eight suicides, including two in Millburn, occurred on NJ Transit tracks.

"You just can't fence everything," said Simpson when asked if installing fences around train tracks  to deter trespassers was an option. "To all of our customers, if you see someone trespassing on the tracks, just dial 9-1-1. Tell them where you are, that gets us to the dispatch, the train operators to slow the trains and stop them in the vicinity."

Related Topics: New Jersey Department of Transportation, New Jersey Transit, Suicide, and Train

M White

7:44 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

A few days ago a NJT train closed its doors on someone at the Maplewood station. The doors do not spring back. In fact, the doors closed with such force, they caused bruising & pain. A train official was watching but did nothing. This does not show a commitment towards safety to me. It shows a disregard to commuters.

Reply

Pete

9:23 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

The doors don't close unannounced - no pain and no bruising if the person had either turned up earlier or waited for the next train.

Hard to feel bad about trespassers getting killed either.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

10:44 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Jeez, harsh Pete! Kick puppies much?

Comment_arrow

Monk

10:10 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

Nick, if someone trespasses and gets themselves hurt (and causes their family and friends untold grief and damages someone else's property and gives some poor engineer nightmares for months and ruins scores of other riders' plans and ...), why should that one pathetic person be held up as the greatest loss? A loss? Yes, but keep things in perspective. A trespasser is hardly as innocent as a puppy. You insult puppies everywhere. Puppy basher.

Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

10:15 am on Monday, February 13, 2012

No one said it was "the greatest loss", Tom, Troll Pete said it was "hard to feel bad" about it. And you're going to take time out of your day to give me a piece of your mind over THAT? Real noble, Tom, you sure out-thunked me on that one.

Comment_arrow

Monk

2:28 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012

I don't know Pete from anyone, but I would have to agree that it's hard to feel bad for trespassers or any other law breaker unknown to me personally. (I admit I assumed that Pete implied the "unknown to him personally" part. But, note that Pete nowhere stated he bore ill feelings toward trespassers. He just offered no sympathy.) I see two issues here: (1) Focusing too much on "victims" who put themselves in harm's way without consideration of the many others affected by their risky behavior; and anyone who gets caught in a closing train car door would seem to have taken a risk to be in that position. (2) Inordinate fleeting sympathy for complete strangers in common, albeit tragic, situations. People may sincerely believe they feel the pain and sadness of the world's population, but it's pretty unlikely that they actually do. At least, I don't believe any human has the emotional capacity to sympathize with numerous complete strangers for much longer than it takes to type out cyber condolences.

Nick, you are a frequent commentor/responder to Patch, including this article. So, I'm surprised that you would question why I would take the time to post.

m561

11:01 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

I think its about time that NJ Transit removed traces of old grade crossings and paths as well as properly fence of areas that people shouldn't walk. Places where it is unsafe for pedestrians to cross shouldn't look like constructed grade crossings or popular paths.
It is incredibly sad and shocking that 23 people died from train accidents last year. I had no idea that many people had been killed. These trains travel so fast, safety measures absolutely need to be more stringent. I am saddened that so many people had to die before something like the Safety Along Railroads Leadership Oversight Committee was formed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monk

7:13 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Aren't a lot of rail fatalities suicides and people under the influence of alcohol or narcotics? Don't a lot of rail fatalities occur in the wee hours? I'm not saying the loss of life isn't cause for sadness, but no amount of safety improvements/spending will prevent the harm that comes to people who seek harm or flirt with it.

R. Swanson

9:29 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

What a waste of time, money, and effort. Once again NJT acting as an agent of then nanny state, trying to protect people from their own stupidity. Like improved signage is going to stop dumb teenagers from trespassing on tracks. Also, you can't fence everything - it's impossible. These efforts are nothing more than an expensive publicity campaign by NJT to reduce its own liability when these incidents occur. Free will brings responsibility on the part of individuals - you can't legislate or regulate that people act intelligently. If someone wants to play on the tracks, they are going to get killed. Period. Put the money into improving train service, which is generally horrible.

Reply

TCG

10:34 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

I have an idea. Instead of spending all this time and money on measures that will do little or nothing to prevent people from getting hit by, or jumping in front of trains, how about spending some time and money to make them run on time? NJT is a monopoly with no interest in serving it's customers because there is no incentive to do so. Safety? Please.

Reply

Noreen McManus

1:24 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Have a little compassion. Loosen up the nails.

Reply

Prentiss Gray

9:45 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

This illustrates one of the big benefits of aerial monorails, they aren't in the motorists way and people don't get killed on the tracks. They also don't get held up by snow or flooding and the infrastructure is much cheaper to keep in good repair.

Reply

Leave a comment