Are School Lunches Too Small and Too Expensive?
Students are complaining of smaller lunches, higher prices.
The recent changes to school lunches are all the talk right now, and students have expressed concerns that prices have risen and lunches are no longer filling.
In Parsippany, students at the high school have staged a strike, refusing to buy food in the cafeteria and opting instead to brown-bag their lunches.
Bridgewater-Raritan business administrator Peter Starrs said the district participates in a child nutrition program that funds meals at the schools, and the USDA has implemented new food regulations.
This is all being done through the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, which was put in place to combat obesity. School districts that do not comply are levied hefty fines.
But students at the Bridgewater-Raritan High School have said that prices are now higher, and they are being served less food.
So, we want to know what you think. Are lunch prices too high for the amount of food students are getting? And should they be forced to eat certain healthy foods while in school?
Take our poll and let us know what you think in the comments below.
Nancy Hatoff
6:50 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Beside to much money. They do not have enough food for all the kids to eat. My son is in high school. By the time he gets to his lunch there is no food except salad.
Linda Evans
7:24 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
My girls brown bag it now. Too expensive and they were coming home starving. Just not right.
Fred
7:59 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Here's the problem with the one size fits all Government control. My kids are in great shape and participate in mutiple sports both in and out of school, yet they are the ones being penalized and undernurished with this program. How about this, give out different passes for the obese kids that limits there choices and leave the heathly kids alone.
Kelly
8:44 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Wow Fred. What a way to make overweight kids feel even worse about themselves.
Fred
9:46 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Kelly,
I was waiting for the self-esteem police to show up. My concern is for the kids that are underweight, growing, and/or athletes who are now, not being allowed a proper meal for thier needs at school due of this government program. Either get rid of the program entirely or have it focus on the people who exceed the governments obesity standards. I'm sure there is already a government program in place to help these kids with thier self-esteem problems.
notanative
9:04 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
why is encouraging and teaching kids to make healthy food choices a penalty?
all three of my graduates brown bagged it every day because they didn't like the unhealthy food choices and long lines....guess they weren't into soda, pizza and fries.
Liz Lande
9:10 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Here's a suggestion: have members of the BOE and the Superintendent's office randomly have one lunch a month with students in their schools. That's 9 members of BOE, plus anyone in the Wade building who makes lunch decisions, if they split this up it is easily achievable. They need to eat the same food the kids eat. (And if they aren't already doing so, they should be visiting lunch rooms).
In terms of price, it is expensive - but so are ingredients and personnel. I dislike that parents have to pay a fee to pay using a credit card on the on-line payment system. This should be covered in the food service provider's overhead!
It is easy for parents to criticize, but until we've actually eaten in a cafeteria and seen what goes on, I think we should reserve a bit of judgment.
The media should also be careful when picking this topic to discuss. Every report I've read/heard has had lots of sweeping generalizations.
I sent my kids with lunch today. I think comparing in terms of calories and price (I sent turkey sandwich on white bread, chips, an apple and vanilla milk) it was a wash. I too could have sent a healthier lunch. But would they have eaten it? The government - and even I can't make them!
Beth Stone
12:03 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Here's an example of a lunch served last week at the middle school. It was "Breakfast for lunch". The kids got one piece of french toast and some canned fruit. How is this enough or appropriate to energize our kids? AND it cost $2.55! I understand the cost of food has increased hence the rise in lunch prices, but if the kids are receiving less and less food, then don't increase the price (or just give them a full serving!)
Drew
3:57 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Of course they are still hungry, they are probably going through withdraw from eating all that processed, empty calorie, high in sugar junk. If the kids won’t chose what’s healthy or not and the parents not teaching it. Well then don’t let the junk food be an option and the schools can be one less place parents of fat kids can blame.
school lunch= crap
4:08 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Fred,
I am happy to see that I am not the only one who thinks studens in good shape should not be punished. For example last week when I was getting lunch I noticed that they got rid of the pizza and replaced it with a small excuse for a ham sandwich.
I have football after school and that pos left me sol. I had major hunger pains and I am not able to fully perform on a diet set for a person who lives a seditary life style. Most people are blind to the fact that the school lables us all as over weight and the only tasks we accomplish is getting a kill streak on mw3. The parents of these fatt kids need to help us solve this problem. Just think that once johnny lardo gets home he will raid the pantry and take in even more calories than if the school just gave us a good meal!
Tristan Coyote Bach
1:18 am on Monday, April 15, 2013
These new regulations are geared to support a fallacy; the fewer calories that students receive through their school lunches are going to have a VERY small impact on obesity. Not only are obese kids going to continue to keep their excessive calorie intake, but they're going to INCREASE it to make up for the lack of proteins they're receiving at school. This situation is easily comparable to gun laws or any other national conflict right now. People need a change of heart/mind, not new laws and regulations. We need more classes to educate students of proper, nutritional diets. We need more classes that will help guide them in their diet change; changing your diet is a life-style change.
Also, as an 11th-grader at University High School, Spokane, Washington, I can say from personal experience that, for how much food I'm getting, the price is WAY too high. At my school, we are limited to 4 items (two of them being small cups of fruit and the other milk [mandatory]). How much does this cost? $3.00. It's no wonder kids are getting fat; they could buy 15 packets of Top Ramen with $3.00. Regardless of whether or not they change these calorie regulations, the price NEEDS to be dropped.