.
News Alert
UPDATE: Massive Brush Fire Rages In Berkeley,…

Decision on Controversial Development Expected Tuesday

The most recent meeting involved cross-examination of the opponents’ expert.

With only time for about an hour of testimony on the Lang application at the previous meeting, the planning board heard the cross-examination of the opponent’s expert on endangered species, and is expecting to wrap up the application at Tuesday's meeting.

This portion of the meeting was originally scheduled for a special meeting Oct. 29, but it was cancelled due to Hurricane Sandy.

“Barring any unforeseen event, this case will likely be concluded at the next meeting,” councilman Filipe Pedroso said in a statement after the most recent meeting. “The planning board has been hearing this case since the springtime, and has certainly given both sides an opportunity to present their case.”

The application is for the building of 18 single-family homes on the woodlands formerly owned by the late John Wemple, and currently owned by Steven Lang.

Wemple, who willed the property to his nieces and nephews after his death in 2002, had maintained to his neighbors that he never wanted to see the land developed, and made that a part of his will, which was overturned by the Superior Court of New Jersey in 2005.

Although the applicant has already rested his case, Stop 18 Homes—a group formed to oppose the application itself—has called in engineers and experts in endangered species to testify as to why the development should not move forward.

After spending the most recent meeting hearing from environmental expert Blaine Rothauser about the study done by the applicant on the possibility of endangered and threatened species living on the land, the applicant took an opportunity to cross-examine.

Much of the questions for Rothauser centered on his credibility, and his thoughts on whether all development should be stopped because of the concerns of the possible appearance of endangered species on the property. The applicant, in his questioning, said Rothauser has, in prior cases, refused to provide favorable reports for such development, and his credibility in this case was questioned.

Rothauser has testified that, in his study, he found threatened and endangered species on nearby properties, and the condition of the Wemple property is such that endangered species could live there as well.

Rothauser said he has not been granted permission by Lang to examine the property itself, and therefore has not found actual evidence of the animals there.

During the questioning, Pedroso asked whether a citizen can report a potential site of endangered species to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, to which Rothauser answered that that is allowed.

Pedroso questioned why this has not be done by any members of the opposition.

Rothauser said he is working with the members of Stop 18 Homes on this, but the treasurer of the organization has been away and a decision has not been finalized because of the additional costs necessary to submit reports to the DEP.

Those against the application said they believe there needs to be additional studies done on the property because they do not have actual proof there are endangered species there since they have not been allowed to examine the property on their own.

Following the cross-examination, John Thonet, the engineer hired by the opponents to the application, began his testimony talking of wetlands and drainage, but only had time to talk of his qualifications and submit some reports as evidence.

The meeting was adjourned before testimony could continue, and it will continue Tuesday at 7 p.m. at the municipal complex. A decision about the application is expected that evening.

“I had the opportunity of walking the property, and even took a sip from the natural spring on the northern end,” Pedroso said after the meeting. “It is a magnificent piece of open space in the center of our township. I have followed the case with great interest and detail, and ultimately make a decision on all cases that is fair, just and proper, giving consideration to both sides of the argument.”

Pedroso said he often drives down Foothill Road, and still sees a neighborhood similar to the one that was there 30 years ago when he was playing there as a child.

“I think the governing body and the residents have done a wonderful job at maintaining the character of the neighborhood for all these years,” he said. “Protecting the splendid, charming character of our beautiful residential neighborhoods has always been a paramount concern of mine.”

John Dunphy October 25, 2012 at 04:22 PM
Maybe I missed it, but I would like to know if Steven Lang lives anywhere near where he wanted to put another development onto a community that appears to obviously not want or need it?
Your Neighbor October 25, 2012 at 07:26 PM
Well said. The community does not want nor need this development.
Bob Vauchewr October 25, 2012 at 08:28 PM
Steven Lang has no interest in the comunity.He has never tried to reach out to the !8 home Comunity.
Golden Gal October 26, 2012 at 02:49 PM
Steven Lang does not live in Bridgewater,and we certainly do not need this development!
Harvey November 13, 2012 at 01:54 PM
I have no problem with a new development. Allowing for new and better housing stock, when a town is somewhat stalled in terms of new construction, is how you attract young up and coming families. Towns like Westfield and Basking Ridge don't give builders a hard time with anything and look a what has happened the last 15 years - those towns have thrived. School are bursting and successful young families everywhere. Future wealth/economic diversity is needed for our tax base which is getting a bit old in town, especially in that section. That leads to poor school voting records, then poor schools, then reduced values of our homes. To be frank, the housing options in that immediate part of town are poor at best - a lot of 30 to 50 year old homes that are cramped and without the amenities that can attract young vibrant growing families that will keep our town on an upswing. BTW, Talk about biased reporting, Ms Levine, including the quotes from Pedroso"I even took a sip from the natural spring on the northern end" - ugh - politician speak! How about some more quotes from the people who are wanting to invest in our town!!!
Your Neighbor November 13, 2012 at 02:12 PM
Cliffs notes: renovations are hard, let's slash and burn wetlands.
Harvey November 13, 2012 at 05:12 PM
Wetlands? In central Bridgeewater? It's called woods where I'm from. Lets bring some new home options to an aging part of our town.
Your Neighbor November 13, 2012 at 06:47 PM
There are wetlands throughout Bridgewater. For everyone's benefit, it is good that we are not relying on you as an expert witness in this matter.
Nicholas Clark November 13, 2012 at 08:22 PM
And where do you live Harvey? I betcha nowhere near this proposed development. I always find it interesting how people are so easy to pass judgment on other peoples neighborhoods. And oh by the way, why don't you post your phone # so maybe next time Ms. Levine can get a "non-biased ;)" opinion from you. A big Ughhh to chronic whiners.....
Actual_environmentalist November 13, 2012 at 08:30 PM
Dear Your Neighbor, If we have "wetlands throughout Bridgewater" what is the obsession with this land? This isn't about preserving wetlands is it? This is about the neighbors wanting to preserve their woodland views. I would love to know what aside from whining and complaining about the development these neighbors/environmentalists have done to preserve our local ecology?
Your Neighbor November 13, 2012 at 08:53 PM
I did not say all of Bridgewater was wetlands. I said that there are wetlands throughout Bridgewater. It is not just about preserving the local ecology, it is about stormwater management, or more specifically preventing flooding. This is an issue that is central to the debate of the appropriateness of this development. I suggest you consult the transcripts of the planning board meetings for more information on what has been discussed to date. To get a better understanding of wetlands and their significance I would recommend you use a search engine such as google and search for terms such as "NJ Wetlands" and "Raritan River Basin".

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something