.

No Decision on Controversial Housing Plan

A special meeting for the application has been set for Dec. 10.

A decision has still not been rendered in the application to build 18 homes on the property formerly owned by John Wemple at Twin Oaks and Steele Gap roads.

The application was heard at Tuesday’s planning board meeting.

The application is for the building of 18 single-family homes on the woodlands formerly owned by the late John Wemple, and currently owned by Steven Lang.

Wemple, who willed the property to his nieces and nephews after his death in 2002, had maintained to his neighbors that he never wanted to see the land developed, and made that a part of his will, which was overturned by the Superior Court of New Jersey in 2005.

Although the applicant has already rested his case, Stop 18 Homes—a group formed to oppose the application itself—has called in engineers and experts in endangered species to testify as to why the development should not move forward.

According to councilman Filipe Pedroso, John Thonet, one of the experts with Stop 18 Homes, was unable to attend Tuesday's meeting, and therefore could not be questioned.

Instead, after comments from the public during the meeting, it was adjourned to a special session on Dec. 10, when a decision could be made.

At a previous meeting, Foothill Road resident Bob Vaucher told the board that Wemple, when he was alive, was an avid car collector, and he often dumped garbage in the back of his property because there was no garbage pickup at the time.

Vaucher was asked to give that testimony again at Tuesday’s meeting because of a tape issue that caused recordings to be lost.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Vaucher said he never saw Wemple dump oil there, but knew that there were never less than three cars on the property.

And in comments about the application, residents said they are against the project, but if it does go forward, they would like to see the character of the community remain, and possibly maintain some of the barns on the land.

In addition, Emile DeVito, manager of NJ Conservation in Far Hills, said at the meeting that he does not believe it can be said that while the habitat on the site will be impacted, there will be no regional impact. Every time a habitat is lost, he said, the animals impacted are closer to being threatened, and there are many on that property that have been cited as being in this situation.

Many residents emphasized at the meeting that they would like to see additional studies done concerning the wildlife and other species currently living on the property.

But officials with Lang said they believe 39 hours of studying on the property was more than sufficient to determine the kind of ecological impact on the property, as well as the wildlife there.

The next meeting will be held at 7 p.m. Dec. 10, with the regular meeting on Dec. 11 also reserved for the application if a decision is not reached.

What do you think? Should more studies be done?

Are you in favor of the application?

Moving_in November 16, 2012 at 12:02 AM
I am completely in favor of the development and would seriously consider buying a home there. There are very few opportunities in Bridgewater to buy a new construction home on a cul de sac.
movingout November 16, 2012 at 02:13 PM
No, I would be leary buying there. I grew up near there, and know about all the streams and established water routes. That valley off Steele Gap and Twin Oaks has always had water problem. There are streams there. Remember: Water runs down hill.
Rica Alexander-Vida November 16, 2012 at 02:53 PM
That is a beautiful, amazing property. To develop it would be a shame.
Your Neighbor November 16, 2012 at 02:58 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
BRIDGEWATER RESIDENT November 16, 2012 at 05:38 PM
Sad, when the owner specifically stated in his will - no development. Why should we even pay lawyers to write one -- I agree about the water, BIG problem for the houses down hill - big problem
Golden Gal November 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM
No to the development. There are plenty of lovely homes for sale in Bridgewater already. We need to protect the few natural,undeveloped tracts of land that remain in the area. Humans do not stand alone on this earth. All living things are interconnected! When will people wake up and realize this.
stewart resmer November 17, 2012 at 01:41 AM
Councilman Moench is a lawyer who works for a big corporate firm, he will find away around the will, thats what lawyers do right?
Nicholas Clark November 17, 2012 at 01:54 AM
Hey look who's back, it's Mr. Resmer, the Wayne resident who loves to comment about Bridgewater issues. Sure sounds like Mr. Resmer has a personal issue with Councilman Moench.
stewart resmer November 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM
and yer point is Nick?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »